De-speaking institutions: three rehearsals. Rehearsal 1
Seminar with Olivier Marboeuf

Olivier Marboeuf, Le Musée du souffle. Peupler la solitude des objets, inventer un lieu qui parle, 2022
Courtesy of the artist
The study seminar De-speaking institutions: three rehearsals takes place within the framework of Olivier Marboeuf’s year-long research residency, titled The Mutineer and the Witch: Essays on Cultural and Institutional Mediation. The seminar consists of a total of six sessions, structured around three essays developed over the course of a year. These sessions complement, inform, and engage in dialogue with the other activities that make up Studies Constellation 2026–2027.
This study seminar is proposed as a space of collective discussion, exchange and bricolage around institutional imagination and craft. The proposition here is to take the experience and learnings of mediation as a vantage point from which to project, deflect, speculate and hallucinate other models and matters of cultural institutionality: forms capable of rehearsing alternative visions of site, work organisation, production, artistic practice and the circulation of knowledge, while redistributing interpretative and institutional agency.
If we are to understand mediation as a bewitched practice that produces negotiated interpretations and narratives in which conditions of presence, interruption, recognition, representation and autonomy are brought into play through interwoven stories and visions, we need to reckon with it as a practice of institutional invention: a practice shaping who may appear, speak, interpret and narrate; which histories become legible; and which forms of opacity, refusal, dissonance and relation may endure. This understanding draws on long-standing traditions of storytelling, particularly Caribbean storytelling, understood as a collective practice of transmission and transformation through which dispersed histories, spectral presences and interrupted experiences are brought together again in situated ways. Each telling is a repetition with a difference, a reprise située: the past is reactivated, altered through the conditions of the present and returned to collective interpretation.
Repetition, reprise, and rehearsal emerge here as a central methodological thread. Rehearsal is approached as a mode of knowledge produced through situated repetition, in which each rehearsal registers the material, historical and political conditions that enable a form to emerge, the forces that interrupt it, reinterpreted it, displace it —and the transformations required for its return. The attention is here on the political choreographies of these forms of circulation, negotiation and reappearance request, and what shape an institution that becomes the scene in which stories are retold and contested can take.
Other methods and devices that animate this research are the interpretative community, the archive, and collective hallucination. Communities of interpretation are approached as a collective formation coalescing around stories, objects, archives and problems; a group committed to their interpretation, transmission and consequences through disagreement, partial understanding, and the coexistence of irreducible positions. Interpretation here becomes a collective practice of composition, sustained through duration, responsibility, and return. In turn, archiving will be approached as a living practice in which minor, diasporic and interrupted histories persist in voices, gestures, rumors, silences, objects, landscapes, songs; activated through the act of telling, when dispersed traces are brought into relation in the present. Additionally, collective hallucination offers another method for institutional imagination. Hallucination is understood as a collective alteration of the conditions of perception, emerging from specific histories, debts, bodies and conflicts, and producing other ways of sensing what an institution may become.
The seminar will further explore Marboeuf’s notion of déparler, or de-speaking, developed in relation to cinema and extended here toward institutional and research practice. To déparler is to undo the authority of instituted speech, disorganise dominant codes of legibility and allow voices to deviate from the identities and positions assigned to them. A déparlante institution thus interrupts the confidence of its own language and makes room for noise, hesitation, multilingualism, opacity, contradiction and embodied knowledge, making room for plural and self-displaced modes of address. This movement is in turn connected to cacophony, as a mode of composition in which voices retain their differences, tensions and unequal positions, sustaining plurality without dissolving conflict and allowing disagreement to become part of the institutional form itself. Through this perspective, other rhythms of facilitation, governance and duration are incorporated, and a space for narratives that remain adjacent without becoming interchangeable is open.
By bringing together experiences from different territories, this seminar aims to imagine non-extractive institutional forms that promote autonomy, while exploring how these might be translated and interpreted in different cultural contexts and economies. To institute, here, means composing a situation, sustaining a relation, activating a latent history, hosting an interruption and producing the conditions under which something can be told again. An art space may therefore emerge with or without walls: as a temporary gathering, a community of interpretation, a living archive, a mobile infrastructure, a wake, a souffle, a rehearsal or a circulation of stories, tools and obligations.
Inside the framework of
Organised by
Museo Reina Sofía
Más actividades
![Isabel Coixet, 100 Years and You Everywhere [100 años y tú en todos los sitios], 2026, película](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Actividades/2.diseminar-mundo.jpg.webp)
John Berger and Isabel Coixet. Continued Ways of Seeing
Thursday, 17 September 2026 at 7pm
Ways of Seeing (1972) is one of the most revolutionary television series on art history, the museum and contemporary critical culture. Across four episodes, an articulate, enthusiastic John Berger unpacks the relationships between classical art through the gaze and new technology, the nude and feminism, the oil painting and commodity fetichism, advertising and consumerism. In essence, a level of critical commitment only comparable to its capacity for dissemination. Unsurprisingly, the series, and the book that would distil it, continues to forge vocations. This session sees art historians Alberto López Cuenca and Modesta Di Paola carry out an analysis of Berger’s audiovisual work, placing the stress on episodes one and four of the series. In the first episode, Berger reflects on the connection between the act of seeing, looking and being in light of new technology, such as the film camera. At the same time, it analyses how the culture of reproduction is turning paintings into messages or fragments of communication while stressing the importance of silence when observing historical paintings. In the fourth and final episode, he introduces advertising as a new iconic-verbal language that shares certain principles with the message of oil painting as a luxury item.
The session opens with the premiere of a filmic letter from Isabel Coixet, one of Spain’s most internationally acclaimed directors, to John Berger, with whom she maintained a long friendship and deep admiration. The short film is testament to the ubiquitous and long-lasting presence of the author of Ways of Seeing, even after his death in 2017.
![Chantal Akerman, Woman Sitting after Killing [Mujer sentada después de matar], 2001, instalación. Museo Reina Sofía](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Actividades/chantal-akerman-mujer-sentada-despues-matar.jpg.webp)
On Your Screen: Art History and the Museum Facing the Audiovisual Challenge
18, 19 SEP 2026
The conference On Your Screen: Art History and the Museum Facing the Audiovisual Challenge sparks debate around the transformations of art history and museum space upon embracing the audiovisual format. Its starting point is John Berger’s emblematic television series Ways of Seeing (1972), a landmark in the democratisation of art-historical discourse. In the series, Berger illustrated how the transfer of a work such as Goya’s Los fusilamientos del 3 de mayo (The Third of May 1808 or the Executions) from museum gallery to home TV screen completely changed the viewer’s experience, allowing the image to travel to straight to the viewer.
In the twenty-first century, this screen-based ecosystem has expanded exponentially, with museums not only physically integrating screenings and devices into their galleries— following in the wake of many exhibitions on the moving image — but also deploying complex virtual strategies. Equally, numerous en vez de a multitudeof historians, students and creators use digital platforms to circulate their ideas and projects. This audiovisual shift opens access to ignored materials and democratises knowledge, as well as challenging traditional hierarchies and the interpretive authority of institutions. The conference, promoted by the research project ATLAS AV: The Audiovisualisation of Art History and the Museum, seeks to analyse this vast audiovisual material, its archives, and its capacity to transform the memory of art.

Godard and Miéville: Time and Ruin
Friday, 18 September 2026 - 7pm
Inside the framework of the conference On Your Screen: Art History and the Museum Facing the Audiovisual Challenge, this film series sets forth three critical visions of the museum via three sessions featuring the works of John Berger, Jean-Luc Godard and Anne-Marie Miéville, Ariella Azoulay, Alan Resnais and Chris Marker, Kwate Nee-Owoo, and the premiere of short films by Isabel Coixet and La Vulcanizadora (Maria Rojas Arias and Andrés Jurado). In classical theory, the museum gives the world meaning; it contains fragments of the past, granting them a history, a narrative that explains preterite time and the present. Today, there is an implicit assumption that this function hides and legitimises forms of power, yet what if the museum, instead of explaining the world, multiplied it through radical ideas, silenced periods and repressed subjects? Such is the approach of the film-makers and artists in this film season.
In 1972 the writer John Berger opened the landmark television series Ways of Seeing with an iconoclastic gesture: slicing Sandro Botticelli’s painting Venus and Mars (1485) in London’s National Gallery. A transgressive act that recalls contemporary attacks on the museum by dissident youth and with which Berger, after revealing it was a reproduction, sought to ignite debate around the idea of an original artwork and a copy. In this, the hundredth anniversary of his birth, the first session pays homage to one of the great art writers of the twentieth century. Starting with a review of Berger’s audiovisual work by art historians Alberto López Cuenca and Modesta Di Paola, the series begins with the premiere of 100 Years and You Everywhere (2026), an unreleased short film by Isabel Coixet composed as a beautifully crafted letter to Berger, and continues with an analysis of fragments of Ways of Seeing in relation to the museum and contemporary art.
The second session screens two medium-length films by Jean-Luc Godard and Anne-Marie Miéville on time, ruin and museum. In The Old Place. Small Notes Regarding the Arts at Fall of 20th Century (1999), both film-makers consider what remains of that “old place”, the museum, at the close of a century of wars and totalitarianism, and ask whether it should be more of a legend or desire than a place. This same driving principle leads Godard to build his own imaginary museum in Reportage amateur (maquette expo) (2006), a rickety toy museum which, paradoxically, contains the great film-maker’s full power of thought on history and images.
Finally, the third session explores one of the major challenges of recent years: the decolonisation of the museum, the recognition of its link to imperialist discourses of power and the need to situate a new silenced or repressed subject at the centre of the Western narration of history. Under the title Museums and Restitution, it includes the film Undocumented. Unlearning Imperial Plunder (2019), by theorist Ariella Azoulay, Statues Also Die, by Alan Resnais and Chris Marker (1953), Kwate Nee-Owoo’s You Hide Me (1970) and the first screening of the short film Quinto verso, parte de Tonada (Fifth Verse, Part of Tonada), by La Vulcanizadora (Maria Rojas Arias and Andrés Jurado), filmed at the Museo de América in Madrid.
![Ariella Azoulay, Un-documented. Unlearning Imperial Plunder [Indocumentados. Desaprendiendo el saqueo imperial], 2019, película](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Actividades/5.diseminar-mundo.jpg.webp)
Museums and Restitution
Saturday, 19 September 2026 - 7pm
Centuries of plundering, decades of amnesia, years of living with unmitigated extractivist power… Does a museum, as we know it, have a raison d'être in a postcolonial society?
This session expounds the operations of the museum as a colonial machine, while putting forward ideas, in narration, for a more just, equal and inclusive institution of the future via society’s marginalised and minority voices. The session begins with the international premiere of Quinto verso, parte de Tonada (Fifth Verse, Part of Tonada), which presents a vision of the Quimbaya Collection (fifth and sixth centuries CE) from the Museo de América in Madrid. It is constructed with the voices and chants of Wayúu mourners and guides, not only as a way of reinstating the role of these gold idols — anthropomorphic figures of men and women used as vessels in ritual practices — but also to imagine that what must be exhibited is not the gold itself. It is the ritual’s own chant. In the classic film You Hide Me (1970), Ghanaian film-maker Kwate Nee-Owoo accesses the British Museum’s collection of African art, located in the building’s basement, to question the meaning behind a museum plundering and nullifying. A fine exercise of first-person institutional critique screened for the first time in Spain. Almost seventy years since Resnais and Marker made Statues Also Die (1953), a reflection on the aura-bearing value of the museum opposite the identity-based and cultural belonging of African art, theorist Ariella Azoulay films the same statues again at the Musée du Trocadéro (today the Musée du Quai Branly), which survive and wait to be reunited with their people. Azoulay, whose wholly original undertaking is a lesson to the museum of the future, connects the forced migration of these sculptures with the mass transit of people crossing borders artificially imposed by the same system that has plundered their culture.

The School of Transformative Institutionalism and Local Organisation
From 21 to 24 September 2026
The School of Transformative Institutionalism and Local Organisation (S.T.I.L.O.) is a programme of joint learning and join strategy which sets in motion a process for the exchange of questions, methodologies and experiences between cultural organisations. The overall aim is to create, circulate and prototype tactics, tools and collective knowledge on institutional practices that open new channels for defending culture and advocating structural transformation in divergent geographical contexts.
The project is part of the Laboratorio de Institucionalidad Compartida (The Laboratory of Shared Institutionalism, LIC), a space for the Museo Reina Sofía’s research, work and advocacy centred on developing, experimenting with and systemising practices, protocols and tools which contribute to a fairer and more liveable cultural ecosystem.
For many years now, so-called infrastructural critique in museums questions material, legal and economic infrastructures, among others, as well as the forms of solidarity and practices required to sustain the cultural ecosystem. By approaching current debates, S.T.I.L.O. raises questions on the ways in which organisations define and interpret their practices, organise their relations and respond to the social contexts in which they operate.
The school gathers four cultural organisations that work via different institutional models – scale, contexts, conditions, different working models — with the goal of pooling common strategies and tools of organisation, advocacy and relationships with local communities.
The programme is conceived as a collaborative process with the participation of Arika, La Revuelta, BAK Basecamp and The Tentacular Museum (Museo Reina Sofía) and is structured around preparatory online sessions and an in-person seminar in Madrid.
S.T.I.L.O. is an activity framed inside the working strand of Situated Organisations from L'Internationale’s Museum of the Commons project, which reflects on the role of museums and art organisations as actors within complex social networks and ecosystems, with a view to exploring new ways to democratise institutions and make them more open, inclusive and useful.

