Difficulty. Forms and Political Effects of Deviation in Writing and Contemporary Art
Study Group

Henrik Olesen, Inferno (Infierno), 2016, Museo Reina Sofía
Difficulty. Forms and Political Effects of Deviation in Writing and Contemporary Art is a study group aligned towards thinking about how certain contemporary artistic and cultural practices resist the referentiality that dominates the logics of production and the consumption of present-day art. At the centre of this proposal are the concepts of difficulty and deviation, under which it brings together any procedure capable of preventing artistic forms from being absorbed by a meaning that appears previous to and independent from its expression. By ensuring the perceptibility of their languages, difficulty invites us to think of meaning as the effect of a signifying tension; that is, as a productive and creative activity which, from the materiality of art objects, frees aesthetic experience from the representational mandate and those who participate in it from the passiveness associated with tasks of mimesis and decoding.
The economy of the referential norm translates the social logic of capitalism, where insidious forms of capturing subjectivity and meaning operate. In the early 1980s, and adopting a Marxist framework, poet Ron Silliman highlighted how this logic entailed separating language from any mark, gesture, script, form or syntax that might link it to the conditions of its production, rendering it fetichised (as if without a subject) and alienating its users in a use for which they are not responsible. This double dispossession encodes the political strategy of referential objectivity: with no subject and no trace of its own consistency, language is merely an object, that reality in which it disappears.
The political uses of referentiality, more sophisticated today than ever before, sustain the neoliberal-extractivist phase of capitalism that crosses through present-day societies politically, economically and aesthetically. Against them, fugitive artistic practices emerge which, drawing from Black and Queer studies and other subaltern critical positions, reject the objective limits of what exists, invent forms to name what lies outside what has already been named, and return to subjects the capacity to participate in processes of emission and interpretation.
Read from the standpoint of artistic work, the objective capture of referentiality may be called transparency. Viewed from a social contract that reproduces inequality in fixed identity positions, transparent in this objectivity are, precisely, the discourses that maintain the status quo of domination. Opposite the inferno of these discourses, this group aims to collectively explore, through deviant or fugitive works, the paradise of language that Monique Wittig encountered in the estranged practices of literature. For the political potency of difficulty — that is, its contribution to the utopia of a free language among equals — depends on making visible, first, its own deviations; from there, the norm that those deviations transgress; and finally, the narrowness of a norm which in no way exhausts the possibilities ofsaying, signifying, referring and producing a world.
From this denouncement of referential alienation, fetishisation and capture, Difficulty. Forms and Political Effects of Deviation in Writing and Contemporary Art turns its attention to the strategies of resistance deployed by contemporary artists and poets. Its interest is directed towards proposals as evidently difficult or evasive as those of Gertrude Stein, Lyn Hejinian, Theresa Hak Kyung Cha, Kameelah Janan Rasheed, Kathy Acker, María Salgado and Ricardo Carreira, and as seemingly simple as those of Fernanda Laguna, Felix Gonzalez Torres and Cecilia Vicuña, among other examples that can be added according to the desires and dynamics of the group.
The ten study group sessions, held between February and December, combine theoretical seminars, work with artworks from the Museo Reina Sofía’s Collections and exhibitions, reading workshops and public programs. All these formats serve as spaces of encounter to think commonly about certain problems of poetics — that is, certain political questions — of contemporary writing and art.
Difficulty. Forms and Political Effects of Deviation in Writing and Contemporary Art inaugurates the research line Goodbye, Representation, through which the Museo Reina Sofía’s Studies Directorship seeks to explore the emergence of contemporary artistic and cultural practices which move away from representation as a dominant aesthetic-political strategy and redirect their attention toward artistic languages that question the tendency to point, name and fix, advocating instead for fugitive aesthetics. Over its three-year duration, this research line materializes in study groups, seminars, screenings and other forms of public programming.
Group director
Erea Fernández
Research strand director
Julia Morandeira Arrizabalaga
Organised by
Museo Reina Sofía
Practical data
Aimed at people with an interest in research, theory, writing and contemporary art.
- Participant selection: Special consideration is given to the suitability of candidates’ trajectory and interests in relation to the study group content and to a commitment to attending all in-person sessions. Session participation entails a three-hour commitment every month, in addition to time devoted to preparation.
- Accommodation grants: Five accommodation grants are offered to those selected who live outside of Madrid. The grant covers accommodation costs for the night corresponding to each session held. To apply for this grant, candidates must provide written confirmation via the registration form, commit to attending all sessions and submit a text or work already completed, in line with the subject matter of the group. The above will be taken into consideration when awarding grants.
Sessions: 23 February, 23 March, 20 April, 18 may, 15 June, 6 July, 7 September, 5 and 26 October, and 14 December 2026; from 4pm to 7pm.
Agenda
lunes 23 feb 2026 a las 16:00
Session 1. Against Transparency. Deviation as a Radical Practice
Work readings:
- Silliman, R. (1981). Disappearance of the Word / Appearance of the World. L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E, 3, pp. 2-12.
- Stein, G. (1998). Composition as Explanation. In C. R. Stimpson and H. Chessman (Eds.), Gertrude Stein: Writings 1903-1932 (pp. 520-529). Library of America.
- Selection of difficult poems:
- Benson, S. (1991). Blue book. La página, encarte, pp. 104-107. (E. Pujals Gesalí, Trad). (Original work published in 1988).
- Bernstein, C. (1991). 3 or 4 Things I Know About Him (3 o 4 cosas que sé de él). La página, encarte, pp. 108-111. (E. Pujals Gesalí, Trad.). (Original work published in 1988).
- Silliman, R. (1978). Ketjak. La página, encarte, pp. 132-135. (E. Pujals Gesalí, Trad.). (Original work published in 1978).
- Stein, G. (2025). A Box (Una caja). In Ídem lo mismo (A. Fisher and B. del Pliego, Trads.) (p. 71). Kriller. (Original work published in 1914).
- Hejinian, L. (2012). constant change figures. In The Book of a Thousand Eyes (p.177). Omnidown Publishing.
- Söderberg, A. (2023). Sound a Rose In [Vídeo]. Vimeo.
- MM Cabeza de Vaca, F. and Salgado, M. (2019). Nana de esta pequeña era (This Littler Era Lullaby) [Vídeo]. HAMACA. moving image platform.
- Tacoderaya (2020). titula este triste ánimo yop uwu [Performance recording made at Centro de Cultura Contemporánea Condeduque’s PoemRoom on 19 November 2020]
Complementary materials:
- Hejinian, L. (2000). Reason. In The Language of Inquiry (pp. 337-354). University of California Press. (Original work published in 1998).
- Andrews, B. (1990). Poetry as Explanation, Poetry as Praxis. In C. Bernstein (Ed.), The Politics of the Poetic Form (pp. 23-44). Roof Books.
- Pujals, E. (1992). Language: un proyecto radical para la escritura de fin de siglo. In La lengua radical. Antología de la poesía norteamericana contemporánea (pp. 9-32). Gramma.
- Pujals, E. and Seminario Euraca (2019). También para la poesía hacía falta un 15M. L/E/N/G/U/A/J/E/o, 2, pp. 17-23.
- Shklovski, V. (1978). El arte como artificio. In T. Todorov (Ed.), Teoría de la literatura de los formalistas rusos (pp. 55-70). Siglo XXI. (Original work published in 1917).
lunes 23 mar 2026 a las 16:00
Session 2. Against Discourse. The Political Effects of Difficulty
Work readings:
- Wittig, M. (2006). El caballo de Troya. In El pensamiento heterosexual (J. Sáez and P. Vidarte, Trads.) (pp. 95-102). Egales. (Original work published in 1984).
- Wittig, M. (2006). El punto de vista: ¿universal o particular?. In El pensamiento heterosexual (J. Sáez and P. Vidarte, Trads.) (pp. 85-93). Egales. (Original work published in 1980).
- Raimondi, S. (2018). Para una poética. Notas. Nayagua, 27, pp. 157-162.
- Chacón, P. (2013, 11 agosto). Cierta literatura actual, ¿no está a la derecha de la sociedad? [Interview with Violeta Kesselman]. Télam.
- Kesselman, V. (2017). A. Rapallo, 2, pp. 8-12.
- Perec, G. (1992). Engagement ou crise du langage. In L.G. Une aventure des années soixante (pp. 67-86). Seuil. (Original work published in 1962).
Complementary materials:
- Wittig, M. (2006). El pensamiento heterosexual. In El pensamiento heterosexual (J. Sáez and P. Vidarte, Trads.) (pp. 45-57). Egales. (Original work published in 1978).
- Wittig, M. (2006). A propósito del contrato social. In El pensamiento heterosexual (J. Sáez and P. Vidarte, Trads.) (pp. 45-57). Egales. (Original work published in 1980).
- Abello, A., Navacerrada, A., Villanueva, C. and Fernández, E. (2025, 14 november). Monique Wittig [Dossier of texts]. Jornada Infierno de los discursos, paraíso del lenguaje. Encuentro alrededor del pensamiento y la escritura de Monique Wittig, La Villana de Vallekas, Madrid.
- Kesselman, V. (2013). Intercambio sobre una organización. Blatt and Ríos.
- Raimondi, S. (2010). Poesía civil. 17grises editora (Original work published in 2001).
lunes 20 abr 2026 a las 16:00
Session 3. Forms of Non-Patriarchal Writing. Drawing from Gertrude Stein and Lyn Hejinian
Work readings:
- Hejinian, L. (2013). My Life and My life in the Nineties. Wesleyan University Press.
- Stein, G. (1998). Patriarchal Poetry. In C. R. Stimpson and H. Chessman (Eds.), Gertrude Stein:Writings 1903-1932 (pp. 567-607). Library of America.
Más actividades

Dear Americas
Friday 29 May and 5 June, 2026
In these films, Marilú Mallet travels to Solentiname, in Nicaragua, and Andahuaylillas, in Peru, to paint a portrait of communities which resist the severity of forced industrialisation. In Solentiname, the focus is on the poet and priest Ernesto Cardenal’s founding of a Christian, poetic and revolutionary utopia, while in Andahuaylillas, a town close to Cuzco, Mallet explores the multiple layers of Andean culture.

A Poetics of the Subject
Thursday 28 May and 4 June, 2026
In the tension between documentary and fiction, between the rawness of a tragic political present and narrative escape, lies the truth of the exile’s condition. In Journal inachevé (Unfinished Diary, 1982) Marilú Mallet experiments with her own subjectivity, moving from affirmation to doubt. In Double Portrait (2000), María Luisa Señoret paints her daughter Marilú, who records the process. In this circular relationship, the film-maker constructs a poetics of the portrait as something perpetually unfinished, a process of exploration in which memory, identity and political history merge to become blurred.

Institutional Decentralisation
28 MAY 2026
This series is organised by equipoMotor, a group of teenagers, young people and older people who have participated in the Museo Reina Sofía’s previous community education projects, and is structured around four themed blocks that pivot on the monstrous.
This fourth and final session centres on films that take the museum away from its axis and make it gaze from the edges. Pieces that work with that which is normally left out: peripheral territories, unpolished aesthetics, clumsy gestures full of intent. Instead of possessing an institutional lustre, here they are rough, precarious and strange in appearance, legitimate forms of making and showing culture. The idea is to think about what happens when central authority is displaced, when the ugly and the uncomfortable are not hidden, when they are recognised as part of the commons. Film that does not seek to be to one’s liking, but to open space and allow other ways of seeing and inhabiting the museum to enter stage.

Ordinary, Common and Public. Common Fixes for Ordinary Communities
Tuesday, 26, and Wednesday, 27 May 2026 – Check programme
Ordinary, Common and Public. Common Fixes for Ordinary Communities is the title of the fourteenth encounter run by Sociología Ordinaria, a transdisciplinary research group that explores daily knowledge deemed ordinary, superficial or frivolous from a traditional academic and intellectual viewpoint.
This latest edition seeks to approach and map connections between concepts of the commons and the public realm — remembering that the ordinary is also the commons — and to ensure affects and moods of discontent are mobilised towards hope.
By way of its multiple declinations — community, community-based practices, the commons, the communal — the encounter seeks to reflect on different ways of creating, (re)configuring, maintaining, fixing, arranging, caring for and defending the public realm and the commons. Furthermore, it explores forms of invocation and experimentation as tools opposite the helplessness of an uncertain present, in addition to resistance against attempts of expropriation, distortion, privatisation and touristification.

Felix Gonzalez-Torres. Sweet Revenge
26 MAY 2026
Nancy Spector and Alejandro Cesarco, curators of the exhibition Felix Gonzalez-Torres. Sweet Revenge, will speak with Manuel Segade, director of the Museo Reina Sofía, in a session dedicated to exploring the interpretive frameworks of this first large-scalepresentation in Madrid of the work of Felix Gonzalez-Torres (1957–1996), whose practice continues to resonate in the present.
The conversation begins with the exhibition’s title itself, Sweet Revenge, understood as a paradoxical notion that articulates much of the artist’s thinking. From there, the tensions running through his work are explored: the coexistence of opposing registers, ambiguity as a method, and the simultaneously affective and political charge of his works.
The dialogue also touches on some of the themes that run through his body of work, such as thenotions of identity, citizenship, and authority, alongside experiences linked to the AIDS crisis, and emotions such as love, loss, grief, and optimism. Special attention is given to the way in which Gonzalez-Torres shifts languages associated with Arte Povera, conceptualism, and minimalism towards open, participatory, and deeply personal structures.
The session also includes a reflection on the research process that shaped the exhibition, providing context for the curatorial decisions and criteria that structure it. In this context, Gonzalez-Torres’s work emerges as a device that actively engages those who activate orinterpret it, distributing responsibility for the production of meaning—a process that is alwaysunstable and constantly under negotiation.
These inaugural conversations, part of the main working strands of the Museo’s Public Programmes Area, aim to explore in greater depth the exhibition narratives of the shows organised by the Museo from the perspective of artists, curators and specialists.


![Tracey Rose, The Black Sun Black Star and Moon [La luna estrella negro y negro sol], 2014.](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Obra/AD07091_2.jpg.webp)